Which approach should be avoided when determining boundaries?

The approach that should be avoided when determining boundaries is over-reliance on anecdotal evidence. This is because anecdotal evidence is based on personal accounts, stories, or informal observations rather than systematic research or reliable data. While it may offer some insights, it lacks the empirical foundation needed for making accurate legal determinations regarding property boundaries. Anecdotes can be subjective and vary greatly in reliability, which can lead to misunderstandings and disputes among property owners.

In the context of boundary determination, relying primarily on anecdotal evidence could result in inaccurate conclusions due to the lack of solid, verifiable information. Instead, comprehensive field research, collaboration with other surveying professionals, and assessment of title records and documents are all essential to ensure an objective and accurate understanding of property boundaries. These approaches utilize factual data and professional expertise, which are critical for establishing boundaries reliably and legally.