If a description shows numbers both as figures and spelled out, and there is a conflict, which typically controls?

When a description presents numbers in both figures and written words, the standard convention in legal and formal documents is that the spelled-out words take precedence over the numerical figures in the event of a conflict. This principle is rooted in the idea that written words are likely less ambiguous and thus provide a clearer understanding of the intended meaning.

In various contexts, including surveying and legal documentation, relying on the spelled-out numbers helps to eliminate misinterpretation that can arise from numerical representation, which might be misread or miscalculated. For example, the figure “1,000” could be read incorrectly as “one thousand” but may also be interpreted incorrectly if it were represented without context (e.g., "10" as “ten” versus “one hundred”).

This prioritization fosters clarity and accuracy in records, thereby ensuring that all parties involved operate under a mutual understanding of the document's intentions. Consequently, in any scenario where numbers conflict, the written words will take precedence unless it can be demonstrated otherwise.